尊敬的全国人大常委会和国务院:
我们是普通的中国公民,也是经常使用互联网的“网民”。由于工业和信息化部近日采用粗暴的方式整治互联网和移动通信网,侵犯了公民的合法权益,引发了社会的恐慌,造成了非常不良的社会影响,我们现依据《中华人民共和国宪法》第四十一条和第六十三条以及《全国人民代表大会组织法》第九条的规定,向全国人大常委会建议罢免工业和信息化部现任部长李毅中。
我们注意到,自2009年中工信部强制要求全国的电脑用户安装“绿坝”软件的阴谋破产后,工信部近日又通过野蛮而粗暴的方式整治互联网和移动通信网。自 2009年12月以来,李毅中领导的工业和信息化部及下属的中国互联网络信息中心(CNNIC)开展了互联网域名注册信息专项治理行动,禁止国内个人域名注册,禁止IDC机房提供虚拟主机服务,停止解析未备案网站的域名,重新备案许可互联网论坛,还有传言说将实施“境外注册的域名将不得用于开展中国业务” 和“境外域名将实施白名单制度”等。有公民戏言,现在只差拔掉网线了!而新年伊始,各地的移动通信公司又开始整治手机用户,一旦用户发送“黄色低俗信息”,将被暂停短信功能。
我们认为,李毅中及其领导的信息产业主管部门在以上工作中犯了以下错误:
1、 不懂得适应现代信息社会的互联网发展趋势,未履行好“推进信息化建设”的职能,执政能力低下。
互联网的产生和发展,是人类文明的成果,它随之又极大地推动了人类文明的发展,为人类的生活方式带来了翻天覆地的变化。我们的生活越来越多地通过互联网进行,互联网为我们提供娱乐、学习、甚至是工作的资源,还有越来越多的人通过互联网进行创业。以互联网为核心的电子信息产业,也是我国的支柱产业之一,而信息化又肩负着带动工业化、走新型工业化道路的重任。互联网也对中国的经济发展和改革开放起到了巨大的推动作用,获得了国家的高度重视。因此,国务院特别赋予了工信部“管理通信业,指导推进信息化建设”的职能,力图通过政府行为来推动信息产业的发展。
据一些专家分析,在工信部近期采取的整治行动中,有十多万家网站被关闭,大量手机用户的短信功能将被暂停。我们认为,这违背了工信部推进信息化建设的职责,是反信息化而行之,既损害电子信息产业的自身发展,又将影响到信息化对工业化和国民经济的带动作用,贻害无穷。更重要的是,这种冒天下之大不韪的做法,极大地影响了普通公民之间以及中国与国际社会之间的信息沟通和文化交往,制约了信息产业的发展,违反了世贸组织《服务贸易总协定》关于市场准入和国民待遇的有关规定,损害了国家形象,将严重损害国家和社会的发展。
2、 侵犯了公民的财产权利和信息权,损害了互联网和移动通信使用者的合法权益。
自互联网诞生以来,越来越多的人通过互联网获取信息或谋生,连过去信息极为闭塞的农民也从互联网了解商情。而工信部强行关闭网站和停止域名解析以及施压中止托管服务等,既侵犯了公民的财产权利,也侵犯了公民通过互联网进行学习、娱乐和工作的权利,还侵犯了公民依据个人兴趣获取信息的知情权。
互联网是很多创业者的合法财产,有很多公民是通过互联网进行创业的。而禁止国内个人域名注册,打碎了很多人、尤其是大学毕业生的创业梦想。国家把就业作为 “保稳定”的重中之重,再三强调要抓好大学生的就业工作,但工信部却在逼迫大学生们失去谋生之路。中新社去年12月17日就曾报道,贵州一名通过互联网进行自主创业的大学生因为个人未备案的网站被关闭而刺死负责审批备案的官员。如果对互联网的管制继续加强,类似的悲剧还会出现,这对国家的发展将贻害无穷。
我们也注意到,工信部在采取有关行动的同时,并没有做好信息公开工作。工信部、中国互联网信息中心、各大移动通信公司至今还没有公开上述政策的具体文件,也没有公开认定“黄色低俗信息”等内容的判断标准。这也导致承担网站托管、移动通信运营等职能的服务商和使用者无法了解有关的政策内容,有些服务商因害怕承担责任而不愿提供服务,大量网站被关停或无法打开,移动手机用户的短信功能被暂停。
更严重的是,在这些用户的权利遭到侵害后,也没有相关的权利救济措施,违反了“有权利必有救济”的基本法治原则,与中央领导人声称的“法治社会”背道而驰。
我们认为,尽管互联网在为人们提供信息交流便利的同时也带来了负面的信息,但对这些负面信息的甄别责任应由网民自己承担,政府无权插手审查。我们对自己甄别这些信息的能力有信心,但对政府官员这方面的能力丝毫没有信息,他们令我们很失望!
3、 整治运动扩大化,加深了社会恐慌情绪,违背了“和谐社会”的发展理念。
打击淫秽色情网站确实合情合理。但不幸的是,“孩子”和“脏水”被工信部一起泼掉了,很多健康的网站也因为看上去不那么健康而受到牵连。例如,很多担负艾滋病知识宣传和性健康教育的网站也惨遭关闭或无法登陆,许多公益组织失去了向高危行为人群提供健康服务的信息平台。这违背了我国防治艾滋病等传染性疾病的策略。
如果仅仅是扫黄也罢了,但实际上全国所有网站都接受了排查。一些托管商在工信部的巨大压力下,不分青红皂白地关闭了所有托管网站。实际关闭的网站有十多万家,但淫秽色情网站毕竟是少数,不可能达到如此惊人的数目。我们不得不认为工信部在重蹈五十多年前的反“右派”斗争扩大化的覆辙,在盲目地制造社会恐慌。
工信部千方百计地为人们使用互联网设置障碍、试图阻隔国内外的信息交流,让人想到一千九百多年前那个滥施暴政的周厉王。工信部的种种举措也是想堵住老百姓的嘴巴,只是技术上更加先进一点罢了。但“防民之口、甚于防川”,周厉王最终却被赶走了。难道工信部没有吸取这么经典的历史教训?如此制造社会恐慌,只会激化原有的社会矛盾,并制造出更多的矛盾,进而影响到社会的稳定和发展。
综上所述,我们认为,李毅中不能充分认识自己及其所在部门的职能,更不了解当前的社会形势和信息产业的发展趋势,在侵犯公民合法权益的同时,又盲目激化和制造社会矛盾。因此,他不适合继续担任工业和信息化部部长,我们建议:由全国人大常委会和国务院向将于3月5日召开的十一届全国人大三次会议提出罢免现任工业和信息化部部长李毅中的议案。
此致!
建议人:万延海,北京居民,身份证号:310104196311202816,电话和传真:010-88114683
建议时间:2010年1月21日
Google,祝贺你回到仁慈的主的怀抱。是的,我们在此祝贺而不是哀悼你。当耶路撒冷的太阳终于照耀你冷寂的坟墓之时,我们将迎接你的复活。 以下的真相,如果你有怀疑,如果你觉得其他的说法才是真的,那么请你解释这样一个事实: Google总部在声明退出中国之后,立刻取消了所有中国工程师访问Google代码服务器的权限。他们都是在上班后发现服务器的home目录进不去了。事先根本没有通知。很多人写到一半的代码,就没法动了,要等几个礼拜之后,调动到美国才能继续写 如果Google是有预谋的撤离,为什么要采取这种手段?他完全可以让员工继续工作,做一些善后工作。比方说现在Google music,中国公司和美国做的是不一样的(music.google.cn 和 music.google.com)现在要取消中国的music了,完全可以让中国的工程师来做这个代码迁移的工作。 现在是中国的工程师全部带薪休假,由老外来接手善后事宜。 为什么Google突然那么不信任中国这边的团队?毕竟他们自己开发的代码,让他们自己来做迁移肯定效率更高啊 唯一的原因就是,Google内部的技术人员中被安插了党的特务(就在Google上海办公处) 事实真相就是,这个人在受到党的派遣,应聘Google成功之后,就把Gmail的关键代码down下来然后上交给了组织。 而这个组织破解gmail系统的目的就是为了获取“人权团体”的邮件,这些在Google官方的声明都有 这样一来会暴露gmail系统的所有漏洞,而且Google官方不能承认这个事情,否则他在国际上的声誉会大受影响。他能做的就是停止中国所有的工作,中国这边所有的工程师已经不能登陆google的代码服务器了。然后应该会抓紧几天时间修改一部分gmail代码 其实事情就是这样简单完全是突发事件,所以Google的官方声明,你去读一读原版,写的是很仓促的,字里行间都能读出他们最高层的震惊,就是Google三个最高层的人临时讨论一致决定的。如果是什么和美国政府商量好的,你觉得堂堂Google的官方声明会写的那么潦草,一点正式文件的套路都没有? Google撤离也不是因为互联网审查,这个当然是一件很让Google不舒服的事情,但这几年他不也就这么忍下来了嘛 特工这次的窃密行动,使Google有面临全面破产的危险(Google官方博客也说了,牵涉到知识产权的问题),说白了,再在中国呆下去,可能要威胁到整个公司的生存,所以才如此仓促的把中国部门的一切工作全部停掉 所以Google一开始还说打算和中国谈判,但是今天马上就放弃谈判的打算了,因为就算政府让步,Google也不能再留了,再留就有性命危险。也不是中国市场赚钱不赚钱的问题了,赚这点小钱,把整个公司的性命搭进去,风险太大了 关于Google工程师访问Google代码的权限,Google对于技术人员的诚信是相当信任的。即使是一个实习生,也可以访问99%以上的代码。 Google只有一个代码库,每个进去的人学到的第一条开发原则就是:搜!从代码库里面尽量搜索功能相似的代码,然后给原作者发Email。讲究这种整个公司的代码共享,才会达到有那么高的编码效率。而且Google的代码,注释,和技术说明文档是一体的,对每一个工程师都是公开的 你可以喷我,也可以提出其他的说法,但是请你在回复之前先看完全文,然后想想自己的说法能不能自圆其说!! 我只能说,特工你太辣手了,实在逼得人家混不下去了 补充一: 这个事情还在调查中,有一个人,他是党员,来了Google没多久,就把gmail核心代码下载下来,而且现在这个人已经不知所踪了,这些是可以肯定的 至于他是谁指使的,我们只是猜了 这两天Google总部派人过来和中国每一个工程师喝咖啡谈话,调查是不是这个人还有同伙 同时总部在评估,这件事情造成了多少代码泄漏,哪些代码需要重写 等这些工作做完,就会开始转移中国这里的工程师(要是没有调查就转移,岂不是让别的卧底混入美帝了嘛) 然后这个时候总部应该会给一个说法,让真相大白于天下,等再过一个月左右大家再回来看这个帖子吧! 补充二: 算了我来说吧。 里面一共三个卧底,里面居然还有共产党支部。 里面的支部书记是国安四年前就布的局。 这个朋友本科就是交大出来的,后来去了信安部。 信安部派他会交大信安学院念计算机,天天做算法题, 毕业就进了Google。 之后发展了两个内线,其中一个内鬼暴力破决Gmail的源代码系统, 政府主要是要监控用Gmail的反共分子。 里面不得了,居然还有国安局的党支部小组。 这个老兄拿了100万奖励,外加公务员待遇。 这帮人一下班就偷偷去陆家嘴开党支部会议。 小补充三: google是如何发现代码被转给特工的? 除非google在每个员工的电脑上装监控软件。 要访问代码,必须登陆Google唯一的代码服务器 现在只知道这个人是党员,他在很短时间内浏览了很多代码,而且这个人现在不见了,我只是根据这些猜测他是上交组织了 第一攻击了很多源代码管理服务器, 第二明确地告诉你是非法弄到的。 大家再看会,我的手机就会响起了…… 现在同事大部分已经开始准备离开了,少部分技术人员和法律部的会继续留下来,大家情绪非常失落,谁也没有想到会是这么个结果。 以上信息未经加拿大华人网证实,仅供参考。 |
From:http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2010/01/google-hack-attack/
A hack attack that targeted Google in December also hit 33 other companies, including financial institutions and defense contractors, and was aimed at stealing source code from the companies, say security researchers at iDefense.
The hackers used a zero-day vulnerability in Adobe Reader to deliver malware to many of the companies and were in some cases successful at siphoning the source code they sought, according to a statement distributed Tuesday by iDefense, a division of VeriSign. The attack was similar to one that targeted other companies last July, the company said.
A spokeswoman for iDefense wouldn’t name any of the other companies that were targeted in the recent attack, except Adobe.
Adobe acknowledged Tuesday in a blog post that it discovered Jan. 2 that it had been the target of a “sophisticated, coordinated attack against corporate network systems managed by Adobe and other companies.”
The company didn’t say whether it was a victim of the same attack that struck Google. But Adobe’s announcement came just minutes after Google revealed that it had been the target of a “highly sophisticated” hack attack originating in China in December.
Neither Google nor Adobe provided details about how the hacks occurred. Google said only that the hackers were able to steal unspecified intellectual property from it, and that they had focused their attack on obtaining access to the Gmail accounts of human rights activists who were involved in China rights issues.
But according to iDefense, whose customers include some of the 33 companies that were hacked, the attacks were well targeted and “unusually sophisticated” and aimed at grabbing source code from several hi-tech companies based in Silicon Valley as well as financial institutions and defense contractors.
The hackers gained access to the company networks by sending targeted e-mails to employees, some of which contained a malicious PDF attachment. The malicious code exploited a zero-day vulnerability in Adobe’s Reader application.
Zero day vulnerabilities are security flaws in software for which there is currently no patch. Adobe announced in mid-December that a new zero-day vulnerability in its Reader and Acrobat programs was being actively targeted by attackers. The company made the announcement after security researchers not affiliated with Adobe discovered attacks being conducted against the vulnerability. Adobe patched the critical vulnerability only on Tuesday this week.
In the recent attack on some of the companies, once a recipient clicked on the malicious PDF attachment, a backdoor Trojan program called Trojan.Hydraq was installed on their machine in the form of a Windows DLL, according to iDefense.
IDefense says that when Google discovered malware on its systems in December, it found that the code was communicating with a server set up to receive information stolen from the targeted companies.
“It was configured in such a way that it was able to receive a massive amount of data being exfiltrated to it,” says an iDefense spokeswoman who asked not to be named.
Google was able to determine, by examining the server, that the hackers had struck numerous other companies, she said. Google said in its Tuesday announcement that 20 other companies had been hacked. But iDefense found evidence that at least 33 were targeted.
The recent attacks bear a strong resemblance to another attack that occurred in July 2009, which targeted about 100 IT companies, iDefense says. In that earlier attack, the hackers also sent targeted e-mail to companies with a malicious PDF attachment, but it’s unclear how successful that attack was.
According to Ryan Olson, an analyst for iDefense, the attacks in July and December targeted different vulnerabilities. The one in July affected Adobe’s Reader, Acrobat and Flash applications, which it patched Jul. 30. The vulnerability the hackers are believed to have used in December also affected Reader and Acrobat.
iDefense obtained samples of the malicious codes used in the July attack and the more recent one and found that although the malware was different in the two attacks, the programs both communicated with similar command-and-control servers. The servers each used the HomeLinux DynamicDNS to change their IP address, and both currently point to IP addresses belonging to a subset of addresses owned by Linode, a U.S.-based company that offers Virtual Private Server hosting.
“The IP addresses in question are … six IP addresses apart from each other,” iDefense said in its statement. “Considering this proximity, it is possible that the two attacks are one and the same, and that the organizations targeted in the [recent] Silicon Valley attacks have been compromised since July.”
Olson told Threat Level that the attackers are “incredibly good” at finding new exploits and infecting the right people but that nothing he’d seen in the malware indicated they were above average in writing malicious code.
“The sophistication here is all about the fact they were able to target the right people using a previously unknown vulnerability,” he says.
The iDefense spokeswoman told Threat Level that her company waited a week to disclose details about the attack until after Google went public with the news that it had been hacked. She said it’s her understanding that Google’s source code was targeted in the hack attack.
Google declined to publicly discuss the details of iDefense’s report.
Adobe’s announcement didn’t discuss specifically whether hackers had stolen its source code but said that it had “no evidence to indicate that any sensitive information — including customer, financial, employee or any other sensitive data — has been compromised” in the attack.
This post was updated with information from Olson about the malware used in the attack. It also was updated to clarify that the Hydraq trojan and PDF exploit were used to breach some of the companies, but not all of them.
Read More http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2010/01/google-hack-attack/#ixzz0cYRw8VOb






Flash Player文件